How I got published, part 4 – The Waiting Game

Welcome to part 4 of a series detailing from start to finish how A Year of Hitchcock went from a neat idea to a published book (Scarecrow Press, 2009). Every step of the way, from writing to pitching to all the work we had to do after it was sold. If you’re an aspiring writer, hopefully this will help give you some insight on the process as my co-author Jim and I experienced it.

The query letter was the subject of my last blog post. If you’re not familiar with what a query letter is, go read that post. I’ve even included the text of the letter that helped us grab the eye of a few publishers.

So in our first batch of six queries sent out in late 2006, we had a publisher interested in seeing the full manuscript. Wow! Not at all what I expected. See, throughout the process I tried to keep our expectations realistic. Cautioned Jim that it might take a while to find a publisher, that the process would be a long one, that we’d get dozens of rejections before we found someone. Needless to say, interest this quickly stunned me.

Suddenly we’re in heavy work mode WAY sooner than expected. Jim and I live in different states, so we’re not usually working face to face. Most of the book was co-authored online, but with our sudden need to polish the whole 120,000-word manuscript and to do so FAST, we decided to get together for a marathon weekend of work. We worked about 36 hours from Friday night to Sunday night reviewing, revising and editing the text for the third or fourth time. It was exhausting, but we wanted to be sure we sent out as polished a manuscript as we could muster. Then I asked someone from my office, where I work as an editor, to proofread the whole thing. FAST. Thanks, Linda!

And with that done it went out the door. We heard back. They passed. D’oh!

But you don’t stop there. You have to be prepared for many, many rejections. You have to keep pushing forward. So the same day we heard back that the publisher had passed, we sent out another five letters. A few weeks later, another hit! Another publisher wanted to see the manuscript! Hooray! This publisher was Scarecrow Press.

It’s now May 2007, a few months after we’ve finished the book. We once again ship out the full manuscript. It arrives at his office a few days later. And so we wait.

And wait.

And wait.

And wait some more.





October. Finally, in the last few days of the month, we hear back from the editor in question, Stephen Ryan at Scarecrow Press. Mr. Ryan found the manuscript “intriguing,” but said we’d have to agree to “a few changes” before he could offer us a contract. Well that was a good sign. He was already implying a deal is possible.

Did we jump right at the offer? We did not. Though thrilled to be on the cusp of publication, we wanted to know what these changes were going to be. We wanted to be published, yes, but we didn’t want to compromise our vision for this book. So we asked him to outline the changes he’d like to see made and we would consider them.

November went by and we did not get the proposed changes.

And December.

And January.

And February.

And March, too.

This is NOT a complaint or knock on Mr. Ryan, who ended up being fantastic to work with and whose suggestions made A Year of Hitchcock ten times the book it was when we first submitted it. That’s the absolute truth. Courteous and helpful to the last, we look forward to working with him again. I point out these delays so other writers know that this is just the way the industry works. Delays are the norm. I have a friend who works as an editor at Bancroft Press and according to him, our wait was about average. This stuff can stretch out over very, very long periods of time. He says he feels guilty to leave some authors waiting for upwards of a year, but the backlog of work is TREMENDOUS.

So learn patience.

Oh, and DON’T STOP WRITING! As you’re playing the waiting game, ensure you’re at work on another project. For instance, while all this was happening I was finishing up a book on the history of Lakehurst, NJ and the surrounding area, best known for being the site of the Hindenburg Disaster. (The book remains unpublished. If you publish local history and have an interest, contact me!)(2016 edit: the book is now available.) While your project is on hiatus, start a new project. KEEP WRITING!

Finally, in April 2008, we heard back from Mr. Ryan. Yes, he’s still interested in working with us. We’ll just have to includes changes that amount to … well, pretty much re-writing the entire book! Yikes!

More on that next time.

Read part 1 (Introduction), part 2 (Ideas & Execution), part 3 (The Query), part 4 (The Waiting Game), part 5 (Revising & Rewriting), and part 6 (All That Other Stuff), and take a look at the resulting book. Learn more about Eric here, and find out more about his independent editorial services here.


  1. Jim McDevitt


    Liking the series so far. One thing, it was April of 2008 when we heard from Stephen Ryan again. Nearly a year after he first expressed interest in the manuscript.

  2. admin


    That’s what I’ve got. First contact May 2007, then contact in late October, then forward to April when we got the list of revisions. I went through our email archives to be sure of the timeline.

    A two-year process overall. I pity the impatient who try their hand at this.

  3. Jim McDevitt

    Yes, that’s right. It was May of 2007 for first contact, and then April of 2008 when they asked for revisions and offered a contract. The second to last paragraph of this post makes that unclear.

Comments are closed.